Post-Platform Digital Publishing Toolkit

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
articles:guest_article_1 [2025/06/10 20:01] wgparticles:guest_article_1 [2025/11/18 00:09] (current) wgp
Line 1: Line 1:
-**Guest Article #1: An Excerpt from "How to Cypher Sex: A Manual for Collective Digital Self-defense Guides"**+====== Guest Article #1: An Excerpt from "How to Cypher Sex: A Manual for Collective Digital Self-defense Guides" ======
  
 This is an excerpt from Cypher Sex's manual for collective self-defense in response to the 2018 US-based bill FOSTA/SESTA. Find the full text on: [[https://cyphersex.org]] This is an excerpt from Cypher Sex's manual for collective self-defense in response to the 2018 US-based bill FOSTA/SESTA. Find the full text on: [[https://cyphersex.org]]
Line 5: Line 5:
 ---- ----
  
-**Chapter 1: Why Self-Defense?** +====Chapter 1: Why Self-Defense?====
 In most resources, guides and trainings, the tips and strategies used to protect ourselves from harm when using online tools and digital devices are usually presented using the terms “digital security” or “cybersecurity.” In this manual (and our previous guides), we prefer to focus on “self-defense” from a more self-empowered position rather than on the term “security.” For example, when we think about security we tend to think about something monolithic like a nuclear fallout bunker. While these shelters are certainly considered relatively safe in one of the worst scenarios imaginable, finding security in such a place means there is very little else you can do apart from passively hiding underground until the end of time. Additionally, from the surveillance of citizens in the name of “State security” and the violation of refugees rights in the name of “national security” to ”maximum security prisons” and ”security measures” used to restrict basic human rights for women and children, the word “security” has often been used to support policies that actually limit the freedom of migrants, minorities and even entire populations of totalitarian states. In most resources, guides and trainings, the tips and strategies used to protect ourselves from harm when using online tools and digital devices are usually presented using the terms “digital security” or “cybersecurity.” In this manual (and our previous guides), we prefer to focus on “self-defense” from a more self-empowered position rather than on the term “security.” For example, when we think about security we tend to think about something monolithic like a nuclear fallout bunker. While these shelters are certainly considered relatively safe in one of the worst scenarios imaginable, finding security in such a place means there is very little else you can do apart from passively hiding underground until the end of time. Additionally, from the surveillance of citizens in the name of “State security” and the violation of refugees rights in the name of “national security” to ”maximum security prisons” and ”security measures” used to restrict basic human rights for women and children, the word “security” has often been used to support policies that actually limit the freedom of migrants, minorities and even entire populations of totalitarian states.
  
Line 13: Line 12:
 Without a deep reflection on these trends, often even technologists tend to apply the same top-down cybersecurity approach when using their skills to support grassroots movements and civil society. In the past few years, we have seen attempts at “teaching digital security” to activists and human rights defenders by training them on the use of “secure tools” without making sure that those tools actually matched their threat model with their needs and goals. In the end, this so-called “digital security” approach is counterproductive because tools that are secure but make life more difficult tend to be discarded in favor of less safe approaches that have proved to be good enough to reach a specific outcome. In other words, in emergency cases or when our stress level peaks, we tend to accept some risks as long as we can achieve what we need to overcome an acute crisis. Without a deep reflection on these trends, often even technologists tend to apply the same top-down cybersecurity approach when using their skills to support grassroots movements and civil society. In the past few years, we have seen attempts at “teaching digital security” to activists and human rights defenders by training them on the use of “secure tools” without making sure that those tools actually matched their threat model with their needs and goals. In the end, this so-called “digital security” approach is counterproductive because tools that are secure but make life more difficult tend to be discarded in favor of less safe approaches that have proved to be good enough to reach a specific outcome. In other words, in emergency cases or when our stress level peaks, we tend to accept some risks as long as we can achieve what we need to overcome an acute crisis.
  
-**A Holistic Approach to Digital Self-Defense**\\  +====A Holistic Approach to Digital Self-Defense====
-\\ +
 Digital self-defense can only be effective if it has a holistic approach. Even when a threat is based exclusively in the physical or in the digital sphere, its ramifications always encompass all the contexts of our life; physical, psychosocial, digital and political. For example, intimate partner violence can extend from the physical to the digital level through spying apps or through surveillance over social media accounts while attacks started by mobs at the digital level can expand to the physical level through doxing and physical threats. Of course, violence of any kind always exposes survivors to trauma which can lead to further harm at the social and physical level; for example, due to bias against psychological issues or because of psychosomatic disorders. Digital self-defense can only be effective if it has a holistic approach. Even when a threat is based exclusively in the physical or in the digital sphere, its ramifications always encompass all the contexts of our life; physical, psychosocial, digital and political. For example, intimate partner violence can extend from the physical to the digital level through spying apps or through surveillance over social media accounts while attacks started by mobs at the digital level can expand to the physical level through doxing and physical threats. Of course, violence of any kind always exposes survivors to trauma which can lead to further harm at the social and physical level; for example, due to bias against psychological issues or because of psychosomatic disorders.
  
Line 27: Line 25:
 ---- ----
  
-Find the manual in its entirety on [[https://cyphersex.org]].  --- //[[|Well Gedacht Publishing]] 2025/06/10 09:46//+Find the manual in its entirety on [[https://cyphersex.org]].